Janus Henderson Rejects Victory Capital Acquisition Proposal

The asset manager’s board reaffirmed its preference to be acquired by Trian and General Catalyst.



The board of directors of asset manager Janus Henderson rejected an acquisition offer from Victory Capital in favor of an earlier offer it had received from Nelson Peltz’s Trian Fund Management and venture capital firm General Catalyst.

According to a Janus Henderson statement, “the Victory Proposal is not in the best interests of Janus Henderson and its stakeholders, including its shareholders, clients and employees, and is not actionable because it presents significant consummation risk and uncertain value.”

In December 2025, Trian and General Catalyst finalized a deal to acquire Janus Henderson for $7.4 billion, following an October report that the two firms were eyeing an acquisition of the asset manager.

Never miss a story — sign up for CIO newsletters to stay up-to-date on the latest institutional investment industry news.

Last month, Victory Capital made public a separate offer to acquire Janus Henderson for $8.6 billion, noting that it had made two prior proposals to the board of Janus Henderson in late 2025 that were rejected.

Janus Henderson noted that its clients indicated they would have “significant reservations” about maintaining their relationships with the firm if it entered into a transaction with Victory Capital. To complete a transaction, Janus Henderson would need to obtain the consent of clients representing at least 75% of Janus’ revenue run rate. “Based on this feedback, the special committee has serious concerns that the requisite client consents may not be obtained,” according to the Janus Henderson statement.

The asset manager also noted its shareholders might not approve of a deal with Victory Capital. With two-thirds of shareholder votes cast at a shareholder meeting required for approval and with Trian holding 20.7% of Janus Henderson shares, Janus Henderson noted that a deal with Victory would require support from about 90% of the remaining votes, based on the average proportion of shares voted at recent shareholder meetings.

Janus Henderson also noted it had concerns about Victory Capital’s own shareholders approving a deal. Since Victory announced its deal for Janus Henderson on February 26, its shares have fallen 14%, which could indicate that some shareholders oppose a deal, Janus Henderson said.

A Victory Capital spokesperson did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

“If Janus Henderson were to enter into a merger agreement providing for a transaction with Victory that fails to close, the Company would be gravely damaged,” reads the Janus Henderson statement.

The asset manager also criticized Victory Capital’s financing commitments, stated that Victory has not clarified its estimate of synergies between the two companies, and emphasized that Victory could not justify why a combined company stock would trade at Victory’s multiple.

“In contrast to the Victory Proposal, Janus Henderson’s binding Merger Agreement to be acquired by Trian and General Catalyst is an actionable transaction that offers certain value to shareholders with significantly less closing and execution risk than the Victory Proposal and is on track to be completed on its planned timeline in mid-2026,” Janus Henderson stated.

In a statement, Victory Capital defended it’s proposal to acquire Janus Henderson. “Victory Capital has a long track record of acquiring and successfully integrating investment management businesses while preserving investment autonomy, client continuity and brand strength. We have been clear that we intend to retain Janus Henderson’s investment talent, maintain the brand and minimize disruption for clients and employees,” a statement from the firm said. 

“When Victory Capital has the opportunity to engage with Janus Henderson’s clients and employees, we are confident that they will see the benefits of the combined, global investment management business, which will have exceptional diversification, product and distribution capabilities and be better positioned to compete at scale against the largest asset managers in the world,” Victory Capital said. “We have doubts about whether the engagement with clients and employees cited by the Special Committee without our involvement reflects the superior value and long-term competitive positioning for Janus Henderson’s business, employees and clients.”

More on this topic:

Victory Capital Makes Competing Bid for Janus Henderson
Janus Henderson to Be Acquired by Trian, General Catalyst for $7.4B
General Catalyst, Trian Seek to Buy Remaining Shares of Janus Henderson

Tags:

«