Despite a tumultuous 2008, the CIC outperformed many other sovereign wealth funds following the global financial crisis -- the country's $300 billion SWF upped its net profit to $41.7 billion in 2009 from $23.1 billion in 2008.
In the wake of 2008, asset owners are hesitantly returning to the securities- lending world. The landscape, however, has changed dramatically since they left.
Cambridge Associates issued a report showing VC 10-year returns -- considered the most
important measurement of the industry -- were negative 3.7% for
the period ending March 31.
Preliminary
results of a survey by Capital Market Risk Advisors show US respondents
ranked “government changing the rules” as their chief concern for the
year ahead.
Republican Harry J. Wilson, who's campaigning for state comptroller,
called incumbent Democrat Thomas J. DiNapoli’s management of the state
pension fund “the largest Ponzi scheme in New York State history.”
MetLife Assurance's survey showed pension fund trustees and
sponsors are struggling to effectively manage longevity risk, which
ranked second only to the measurement of technical provisions and
liabilities in importance for respondents.
The active versus passive investment debate has raged within academic circles for decades without resolution. Unfortunately for the world’s asset owners, this has left them wondering what game—Chase alpha? Ride beta?—they should be playing.
The consensus: The rise of derivatives and, more recently, extreme equity volatility have driven many asset owners into the arms of risk parity vendors. The debate: Is this a good thing?
The organization is putting pressure on governments and policymakers
to try to avoid relying on current market values when determining
contributions and to allow "appropriate levels of over-funding in good
economic times," among other recommendations.
Europeans (effete liberals!) love it. Public pensions and foundations (goody-two-shoes!) like it. Yet, to American corporate defined benefit plans, socially responsible investing—bearded hippies!—has been anathema to their very existence. Will this ever change?
After a 2.1% loss on its global assets in 2008, the China investment Corp. will likely post its best yearly gain in 2009, boosted by rebounding markets and investment in commodity-related companies.