Investment managers who are highly averse to potential losses may be more likely to be terminated for underperformance, according to a study.
In a recent paper based on a survey of 68 managers, two academics concluded managers who are most averse to losses had a 39% higher probability of leaving the asset management industry than those who were more tolerant.
“Fund management companies may want to screen prospective managers on the degree of their loss aversion to ensure a better match between managerial decision making and a fund’s objectives,” wrote Andriy Bodnaruk of the University of Notre Dame and Andrei Simonov of Michigan State University.
The authors said despite the assumption that asset managers should be immune to behavioral biases, there was a considerable range of loss aversion with significant effects on funds’ downside risk and performance.
More than a third of surveyed managers were highly averse to losses, 38% were in the middle, and 25% expressed more tolerance.
Those who invested most cautiously worked primarily in funds focused on capital preservation such as fixed income and balanced funds. Managers who were the least loss averse were positioned at funds that “pursued aggressive investment policies” like many hedge funds.
The study concluded downside beta was 0.18 higher for managers who were minimally loss averse. Risk-adjusted returns were also 1.16% to 2.11% lower per year for funds managed by those who are highly averse to losses.
Such underperformance translated to managers’ career success, the paper said. Some 36% of highly loss averse managers are likely to be terminated while only 5.9% of low loss-averse managers faced the same fate.
“The fund management companies respond to bad performance by firing underperforming managers and identify the source of managerial underperformance, i.e., high degree of their loss aversion,” the authors said.
Chances of termination were particularly great for funds “invested in the securities which value can fluctuate a lot over time,” versus fixed-income funds, according to the paper.
Read the full paper here.
Related Content: Are You Reducing Too Much Risk?