2016 Outsourced Chief Investment Officer Survey

Survey





Types of Outsourcing Arrangements Used/Planned






  PROVIDER RECOMMENDS



MANAGER SELECTION
PROVIDER HAS



FULL DISCRETION OVER



MANAGER SELECTION
Total respondents 30% (-35%) 70% (+79%)
<$100M 50% (-7%) 50% (+11%)
$100M–$500M 35% (-20%) 65% (+16%)
$500M–$1B 50% (-30%) 50% (+257%)
$1B–$5B 16% (-58%) 84% (+121%)
$5B–$15B 50% (+150%) 50% (-17%)
>$15B 10% (-77%) 90% (+210%)
    (change from 2015)












How Much of the Portfolio Is Outsourced






  100% 75% – 99% 50% – 74% 25% – 49% < 25%
Total respondents 54% (-5%) 14% (+2%) 5% (-40%) 5% (+66%) 22% (+31%)
<$100M 78% (+358%) 22% (+31%) 0% (-100%) 0% (n/a) 0% (-100%)
$100M–$500M 59% (+3%) 18% (-39%) 12% (n/a) 0% (-100%) 12% (n/a)
$500M–$1B 67% (+6%) 33% (+156%) 0% (-100%) 0% (n/a) 0% (-100%)
$1B–$5B 53% (-5%) 6% (-69%) 6% (-2%) 6% (n/a) 29% (+55%)
$5B–$15B 50% (-35%) 0% (-100%) 0% (-100%) 0% (n/a) 100% (n/a)
>$15B 13% (-77%) 0% (n/a) 0% (n/a) 25% (+213%) 63% (+64%)
        (change from 2015)












Reasons for Outsourcing






  CRITICAL IMPORTANT NOT VERY



IMPORTANT
NOT AT ALL



IMPORTANT
NOT



APPLICABLE
Better risk



management
38% 48% 10% 3% 2%
Cost



savings
11% 36% 39% 11% 2%
Lack of



internal resources
56% 34% 8% 0% 2%
Additional



fiduciary oversight
38% 41% 11% 8% 2%
Need to



increase returns
31% 46% 13% 8% 2%
Faster



implementation/



decisions
31% 36% 28% 2% 3%
Desire for



strategic



partnership
18% 25% 26% 26% 5%












Reasons for Selecting Outsourcing Provider






   
Price 20%
Reputation/Peer referral 40%
Experience of top management 30%
Client service 70%
Breadth of capabilities/services 20%
Willingness to be a fiduciary 20%












Outsourcing Goals






  ABSOLUTE RETURN DE-RISKING
Total Respondents 53% 47%
<$100M 57% 43%
$100M–$500M 40% 60%
$500M–$1B 20% 80%
$1B–$5B 42% 58%
$5B–$15B 100% 0%
>$15B 83% 17%