Home > Surveys > 2019 Liability-Driven Investment Survey

2019 Liability-Driven Investment Survey

Art by Jeffrey Decoster

Past Surveys

League Tables


Ten or more client ratings are needed for listing in league tables.
5 = Extremely satisfied; 1 = Not at all satisfied

Overall Offering

1 Western Asset Management 4.70
2 NISA Investment Advisors 4.54
3 PIMCO 4.49
4 Goldman Sachs Asset Management 4.40
5 Prudential Investments 4.31

Responsiveness

1 Western Asset Management 4.70
2 NISA Investment Advisors 4.55
3 PIMCO 4.51
4 Prudential Investments 4.50
5 Goldman Sachs Asset Management 4.46

Timely Reporting

1 Fidelity Investments 4.45
2 Western Asset Management 4.43
3 NISA Investment Advisors 4.42
4 Wellington 4.33
5 PIMCO 4.30

Knowledge Sharing

1 PIMCO 4.57
1 Western Asset Management 4.57
3 NISA Investment Advisors 4.52
4 Goldman Sachs Asset Management 4.42
5 Wellington 4.33

New Ideas and Solutions

1 PIMCO 4.47
2 NISA Investment Advisors 4.45
3 Western Asset Management 4.39
4 Wellington 4.25
5 Goldman Sachs Asset Management 4.21

Accessibility to Investment Team

1 Wellington 4.58
2 Western Asset Management 4.57
3 Goldman Sachs Asset Management 4.54
4 NISA Investment Advisors 4.52
5 Prudential Investments 4.44

Funded Status Attribution

1 NISA Investment Advisors 4.42
2 Western Asset Management 4.19
3 Goldman Sachs Asset Management 4.17
4 PIMCO 4.12
5 Wellington 4.00
Conning, Insight Investment, J.P. Morgan, and State Street Global Advisors received enough responses to be mentioned, but not enough client evaluations to be analyzed in detail.

1 … 5 6 7 8 9 … 22