Transition Manager League Tables
Qualified providers |
Number of responses |
Abel Noser |
11 |
BlackRock |
15 |
BTIG |
11 |
Citi |
12 |
Fidelity |
11 |
Macquarie |
12 |
Northern Trust |
14 |
State Street |
17 |
All Respondents |
99 |
Rank |
“Extremely Satisfied” |
1 |
BTIG |
100.0% |
2 |
Fidelity |
90.9% |
3 |
Abel Noser |
90.0% |
4 |
Citi |
75.0% |
5 |
BlackRock |
73.3% |
6 |
Northern Trust |
64.3% |
7 |
State Street |
62.5% |
8 |
Macquarie |
58.3% |
|
All Respondents |
73.6% |
(5 = “extremely complex”; 1 = “very simple”)
Rank |
Transition complexity |
1 |
State Street |
3.79 |
2 |
Citi |
3.75 |
3 |
BTIG |
3.73 |
4 |
Fidelity |
3.55 |
5 |
BlackRock |
3.40 |
6 |
Macquarie |
3.33 |
7 |
Northern Trust |
3.00 |
8 |
Abel Noser |
2.90 |
|
All Respondents |
3.45 |
5 = “complete disclosure”; 1 = “no disclosure”
Rank |
Disclosure of performance vs benchmarks |
1 |
BTIG |
5.00 |
2 |
Citi |
4.75 |
3 |
BlackRock |
4.67 |
3 |
Macquarie |
4.67 |
5 |
Fidelity |
4.64 |
6 |
Northern Trust |
4.50 |
7 |
State Street |
4.47 |
8 |
Abel Noser |
4.40 |
|
All Respondents |
4.61 |
5 = “always below”; 1 = “always above”
Rank |
Performance vs. central point estimate |
1 |
BTIG |
4.36 |
2 |
Northern Trust |
3.71 |
3 |
Abel Noser |
3.56 |
4 |
Fidelity |
3.55 |
5 |
BlackRock |
3.43 |
6 |
Macquarie |
3.36 |
7 |
State Street |
3.31 |
8 |
Citi |
3.25 |
|
All Respondents |
3.54 |
5 = “extremely satisfied”; 1 = “not at all satisfied”
Rank |
Overall satisfaction |
1 |
BTIG |
5.00 |
2 |
Fidelity |
4.82 |
3 |
Abel Noser |
4.80 |
4 |
Citi |
4.75 |
5 |
BlackRock |
4.73 |
6 |
Northern Trust |
4.57 |
7 |
State Street |
4.38 |
8 |
Macquarie |
4.33 |
|
All Respondents |
4.65 |